Mo Hot My Gone Dee

"God has no religion." Mahatma Gandhi

Monday, May 22, 2023

The Spirituality of Sadducees

When Christians partake of "the body and blood of Jesus" (even in Catholic assemblies, where they say the wafer and wine are, by virtue of transubstantiation, the veritable body and blood of Jesus): they claim innocence of vampirism and cannibalism owing to the fact that the wafer is not human flesh, nor the wine human blood. What they refuse to admit-- whether they understand it or not-- is that this makes them more guilty of vampirism and cannibalism than actual vampirism and cannibalism could: according to their God, the Devil's word.

Be advised: I say the above is so, according to their God, the Devil's word; not according to reality; and no surprise, for the two are not one. Nonetheless-- according to Abraham and all his children (Christians included)-- the only reality is their God: the Devil's word. So, what does the 'Holy Bible' say, appropos to the subject in question?

The apostle Paul writes: "28 For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: 29 But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God [Romans 2:28 & 29]." By extrapolation, this means that the vampirism and cannibalism of Jesus' blood and body are not fleshly exercises, but-- like everything else the Devil commands-- spiritual obedience.

Jesus of Nazareth said, "whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart [Matthew 5:28b]." What this means, vis- a- vis the subject at hand, is that anyone who partakes of communion is a cannibal and a vampire (not to mention a murderer and a thief) in his heart before he partakes; and in deed when he partakes.

This is why Jesus commanded his disciples to observe the ritual of communion: they were all guilty of conspiring against him. It wasn't Judas alone who-- in spite of Jesus-- disputed "which of them [the apostles, that is] should be accounted the greatest [Luke 22:24, et. al.]." They were all guilty of despising and conspiring against him whom they would claim to be the only legitimate spokesmen for. None of Jesus' words would be known if an apostle didn't say "Jesus said." Jesus never wrote a stick- it note; much less a letter or a book or a Gospel.

When Jesus told the parable of the vineyard, the Sanhedrin weren't the only "husbandmen" to whom he attributed the words "This [Jesus] is the heir; come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance [Matthew 21:38c - f]." One of the cornerstone beliefs of the Christian faith is that a man has no righteousness in- and- of himself. It was (they say) therefore necessary to murder Jesus so that all who will might seize on Jesus' righteousness and count his inheritance for their own. Only in this way might a man be "saved" from his own inheritance, they say.

These are the lies a filthy dreamer believes.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Original Sin

What is the Devil? Does it matter what perspective one takes on His Infernal “Majesty?” Does He appear the same way to all who see the invis...