Mo Hot My Gone Dee

"God has no religion." Mahatma Gandhi

Sunday, December 10, 2023

Original Sin

What is the Devil? Does it matter what perspective one takes on His Infernal “Majesty?” Does He appear the same way to all who see the invisible?

The book of Revelation describes the Devil as “a great red dragon [12:3]” with a voracious appetite for fresh, newborn babies (12:4). A “wonder in heaven [12:3].” What one called Paul- the- apostle (Saul of Tarsus) would characterize as a “lying wonder [2 Thessalonians 2:9]” of the Devil. [With an appetite for men: the Mutton of His Pasture (et. al.).] This much of the light the canon of the 'Holy Bible' casts on His character allows a peep of HIM as far back into the canon as Genesis 2.

The first mention of “not good” in the canon occurs in Genesis 2. It is the LORD God’s “spirit of error [1 John 4:6]” (which informs his ways, as Spirit informs Nature) to which this first mention of ”not good” refers. It is also from the horse’s mouth. The LORD God's estimation of His own works, and thus His own way, is “not good,” as recorded in Genesis 2:18.

“And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be [as “made”] alone; I will make him an help meet for him.”

Not good is the simplest way to say “evil” without saying evil. That is to say “not good” is the simplest definition of the word “evil.” Evil is a marked (or counted, which is to say “reckoned,”) absence- of- good. This absence, as all things present do, engages by degree. The LORD God, however, might be utterly void of good. If He is, the witty inventions [man, for one] He claims as copyright are not His own. It's much easier– and therefore more deviant, more devilish– to take credit for someone else's work. [“Footprints In the Sand,” Christians say. Iron Maiden more appropriately calls it “Fear of the Dark”.]

In light of the above: It's fair to say that, when the LORD God cursed the “tree of the knowledge of good and evil,” it was His own nakedness He was cursing in cursing the man who would see the invisible. Inasmuch as their ”Maker” had a deviant Spirit, Adam and Eve had eyes to see the evil (in their own nakedness, if nowhere else). They needed no instruction to grasp “not good.” They could do that masturbating.

Therefore it was “the knowledge of good”-- of which the LORD God is barren– which was so cursed. Evil is implied, if not understood, wherever it sits in solitude: and most places it doesn't. Only in cover- ups is it elsewise, it seems.

Adam and Eve’s Garden of Eden resembles the church of the Laodiceans (of Revelation 3:17): “thou [LORD God] sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked [as that which you've “made”]. [Life tastes like fecal matter and bile in your presence.]. “MENE, MENE, TEKEL, UPHARSIN.” “Wine & Piss” rockers “Lamb of God” say.

Bitter Wormwood; Gravel in the mouth; Cankered, swollen bellies; Rotted thighs: These are some of the things the Doctrine of the 'Holy Bible' calls itself, and says of itself, those times it encounters itself in guises it doesn't– or “can't” for legal reasons– recognize. 

Can anyone but the Devil stand to eat that which calls itself the Blessed Virgin of Christ [It's a “men- only” club, in Heaven, they say.]: at room temperature, “lukewarm?” Were I the Devil, it would seem to me roasted would be better; but He's such a Beast, He may eat it any way He can kill it; and enjoy it the more, the more “disgusting” it is to anyone who didn't birth it.

I suppose Jesus is “the first begotten of the dead [Revelation 1:5]” because– Adam and Eve being dead to the LORD God–: He is dead to them. That which kills Death is Life: “the knowledge of the good.” That which calls upon the LORD God to whom it is dead; and that which responds to it's call is, by definition, sorcery (Revelation 18:23). Let sleeping dogs lie.

“The obedience of Christ” is measured against Adam and Eve's “rebellion,” in that Adam and Eve chose the good in each other; Jesus the “thick darkness” of the LORD God [HIM, the Devil]: as reasonable to die for. I imagine “the tree of the knowledge of good and evil,” tasted each to the other as each other, when Eve and Adam partook thereof.

My nose says: Adam is the “man child” of Revelation 12; Jesus is the “Image of [his Father] the Beast,” in Revelation 13; The “hundred forty and four thousand” Mutton of His pasture of Revelation 14 (and their champion “Lamb”) are gay [Ladies “defile” them.]; Jesus “the Lamb of God” is “the good shepherd” because he's the Judas- goat leading them all to the perdition “the Lamb” and “the holy angels” are present in, in Revelation 14:10; The LORD God is Original Sin; And the ‘Holy Bible' is the Doctrine of the Devil.

Adam and Eve were correct: Better to know good for a moment and die; especially if you might otherwise live forever knowing only Evil. Why take the chance on eating of “the tree of Life” until you're dead to the LORD God? Let the dead bury their own (with- or- without baptism). If I were the Devil: who but the LORD God could begin to get away with my wickedness?

No comments:

Post a Comment

Original Sin

What is the Devil? Does it matter what perspective one takes on His Infernal “Majesty?” Does He appear the same way to all who see the invis...